The United States has struck Iran for the third time, and Tehran has answered by closing the Strait of Hormuz and attacking Gulf states that host American forces — a threshold crossed that transforms a cycle of exchanges into something far more consequential for the global order. Diplomats from Qatar, Oman, and Turkey are moving quietly to find an exit ramp, but the architecture of de-escalation is fragile, built on the same waterway Iran has just weaponized. Meanwhile, the IMF has cut its global growth forecast as the shock of a closing Hormuz ripples into energy markets already pulled between war-driven inflation and a genuine AI-led expansion — two forces that leave central banks with no clean move. The question that deserves a careful answer in the days ahead is whether the back-channel diplomacy underway can produce an agreement before the economic and military pressures compound each other past the point where either side can accept terms without appearing to have lost.
GEOPOLITICS Impact: 10/10
US Strikes Iran for Third Time; Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz and Attacks Gulf Allies
The United States conducted a third round of strikes on Iranian territory following an Iranian attack on a Cyprus-flagged commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, triggering a sharp Iranian escalation that includes closure of the world's most critical oil chokepoint and retaliatory missile and drone strikes against Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE — all host nations to major US military installations. This marks a dramatic widening of the conflict beyond a bilateral US-Iran exchange into a regional war scenario with direct implications for global energy markets, US force posture, and Gulf state stability. Immediate watches: whether Gulf states invoke mutual defense arrangements, whether the US activates carrier strike groups for force protection, and whether oil markets price in a sustained Hormuz closure.
Several structural forces are converging simultaneously: (1) Iranian domestic politics — the reported death of a senior figure, possibly the supreme leader's father, has created both a legitimacy crisis and a revenge imperative that constrains Iranian leadership's ability to de-escalate without appearing weak; (2) the Strait of Hormuz represents roughly 20% of global oil and LNG flow, giving Iran asymmetric leverage that it has historically threatened but rarely exercised — actual closure signals unprecedented willingness to absorb economic self-harm for strategic signaling; (3) US military strike cycles suggest a coercive deterrence strategy that has so far failed to suppress Iranian action, raising questions about strategic coherence; (4) Gulf states hosting US bases — Bahrain (Fifth Fleet), Qatar (Al Udeid), UAE (Al Dhafra) — are now directly targeted, forcing them into an explicit alignment choice they have long sought to avoid; (5) third-party actors including China, Russia, and Houthi-aligned forces may seek to exploit or inflame the situation.
Show reasoning ↓
This story is of maximum geopolitical consequence. A kinetic US-Iran exchange that has now expanded to include attacks on sovereign Gulf states and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz constitutes a threshold event — not merely an escalation of existing tensions but a potential structural rupture in Middle East security architecture built over four decades. The mention of the supreme leader vowing revenge for his 'father's death' requires careful editorial scrutiny: if this refers to the supreme leader himself being a new figure, it implies a leadership transition has occurred in Iran, which would be an enormous independent story and a key driver of unpredictable decision-making in Tehran. Source assessment: the summary lacks attribution to named governments, military commands, or wire services — editors should treat specific claims (Hormuz closure, missile attacks on three countries) as credible in framing but requiring urgent verification from CENTCOM statements, Gulf state official communications, and maritime tracking data before publishing as confirmed. Importance rating reflects civilizational-scale energy and military risk.
Predictions (1)
pending43% confidence1 month
Within 1 month, the Indian Navy will publicly announce activation or expansion of a naval escort/deployment operation in the Arabian Sea or Gulf of Oman to protect Indian-flagged or India-bound commercial shipping in response to the Strait of Hormuz closure.
India imports approximately 60% of its crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz. When far less severe tanker attacks occurred in June 2019, India activated Operation Sankalp within days, deploying warships to escort Indian-flagged vessels. An actual Hormuz closure — unprecedented in severity — virtually guarantees activation of India's established naval protection reflex. The Indian Navy maintains standing deployments in the region and has institutional muscle memory for this exact scenario. This is not a novel behavior but an escalation of a documented pattern.
Check date: 2026-08-11 · Timeframe: 1 month
GEOPOLITICS Impact: 9/10
Qatar, Oman, and Turkey Move to Broker De-escalation Between US and Iran
Regional intermediaries — Qatar, Oman, and Turkey — have activated diplomatic back-channels to prevent the US-Iran standoff from tipping into open conflict, with Iran's Foreign Minister Araghchi personally engaging counterparts on the strategic vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz. The involvement of multiple mediators simultaneously signals both the urgency of the moment and the absence of direct US-Iran communication. Watch for whether these contacts produce a formal framework for resumed nuclear or security talks, or serve merely as pressure-release diplomacy with no structural outcome.
Several converging forces are at work: Iran's need to signal resolve without triggering military retaliation; US pressure campaigns — likely sanctions, military posturing, or covert operations — that have pushed Tehran toward the negotiating edge; and the economic self-interest of Gulf states whose trade and energy infrastructure is acutely vulnerable to Strait of Hormuz disruption. Qatar and Oman have historically served as trusted conduits precisely because they maintain working relationships with both Washington and Tehran. Turkey's inclusion may reflect Ankara's bid to reassert regional relevance and NATO-adjacent leverage. The explicit mention of the Strait of Hormuz by Araghchi is a calibrated signal — a reminder of Iran's asymmetric deterrence capacity without a direct threat.
Show reasoning ↓
This story matters because multi-channel diplomatic mobilization of this kind typically indicates that a crisis has crossed a threshold where key regional actors fear miscalculation is imminent. The simultaneity of Qatari travel to Tehran alongside Araghchi's calls to Oman and Turkey suggests coordination, not coincidence — possibly a structured effort to construct a diplomatic off-ramp. Source assessment: this summary draws on official or semi-official diplomatic reporting, which tends to be accurate on the fact of contacts but may understate the content or urgency of discussions. The Strait of Hormuz reference deserves particular editorial weight — roughly 20% of global oil transits that chokepoint, and any credible threat to it moves energy markets and NATO calculations simultaneously.
SOCIETY Impact: 9/10
Venezuela Earthquake Death Toll Surpasses 4,300 as Casualties Continue to Mount
A catastrophic earthquake on June 24 has killed at least 4,333 people in Venezuela, with nearly 17,000 injured and over 6,400 rescued. The scale of the disaster represents one of the deadliest seismic events in Latin American history in recent decades. Critical questions remain about the adequacy of Venezuela's disaster response capacity given its prolonged economic and humanitarian crisis.
Venezuela's vulnerability to this disaster is compounded by years of infrastructure neglect, an underfunded emergency management system, and a healthcare sector gutted by economic collapse and international sanctions. The Maduro government's historically limited transparency around crisis data raises legitimate questions about the accuracy of official figures — both potential undercounting due to access gaps and possible political incentives to shape the narrative. Regional tectonic activity along the Caribbean plate boundary has long made northern Venezuela seismically active, a structural geological risk that urban planning and building codes have chronically failed to adequately address. International humanitarian access, always politically fraught in Venezuela, will be a decisive factor in whether the death toll stabilizes or grows further.
Show reasoning ↓
This is a major humanitarian crisis story demanding sustained attention. The death toll of 4,333 is extraordinarily high and warrants prominent coverage. However, editorial caution is warranted: the sole cited source is Jorge Rodriguez, a senior government official in a state with documented history of information control. Independent verification from NGOs, foreign governments, or journalists on the ground is essential before treating these figures as definitive. The story also sits at the intersection of natural disaster and pre-existing humanitarian emergency, making Venezuela's institutional fragility as newsworthy as the earthquake itself.
ECONOMY
IMF Cuts Global Growth Forecast to 3.0% as Middle East War and AI Boom Pull Economy in Opposite Directions
The IMF's July 2026 World Economic Outlook projects global growth slowing to 3.0% this year before partially recovering to 3.4% in 2027, with inflation accelerating to 4.7% driven by war-elevated energy and food prices. The report captures a rare dual-force dynamic: geopolitical disruption depressing output while an AI-driven technology supercycle injects demand-side momentum. Investors, policymakers, and central banks will be watching whether AI productivity gains can meaningfully offset the stagflationary pressure of a prolonged regional conflict.
Three structural forces define this outlook. First, the Middle East war is functioning as a supply-side shock — disrupting energy markets, elevating food prices through commodity and logistics channels, and creating uncertainty that suppresses investment. Second, the AI technology cycle is generating genuine demand-pull growth, suggesting that this is not simply a speculative bubble but a productivity-linked expansion with real economic throughput. Third, the divergence between these forces creates a policy trap for central banks: tightening to control inflation risks strangling the technology-driven recovery, while easing risks entrenching elevated price levels. Beneath the headline numbers, income inequality between commodity-importing developing nations and advanced AI-integrated economies is likely widening significantly.
GEOPOLITICS
Iran's Elite Fears IMEC Corridor Could Erode Strait of Hormuz Leverage
Iran's ruling establishment is growing alarmed as the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor advances, recognizing it could create a viable alternative trade and energy route that bypasses the Strait of Hormuz entirely. For decades, Iran has wielded credible threat to close the Strait as a strategic deterrent against Western and Gulf pressure — a card IMEC would substantially devalue. If Israel formally joins the corridor, it would simultaneously normalize Israeli integration into regional infrastructure and diminish one of Tehran's most consequential geopolitical trump cards.
Iran's strategic identity is structurally dependent on the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20% of global oil trade flows — its implicit threat to blockade has historically constrained adversary behavior. IMEC, linking India to Europe via Gulf states, Jordan, and Israel, represents a U.S.-backed initiative to rewire regional connectivity in ways that deliberately exclude and encircle Iran. Gulf Arab states normalizing with Israel under Abraham Accords frameworks, combined with India's pursuit of non-Hormuz energy corridors, reflects a convergent interest in reducing Iranian leverage. Iran's elite also recognizes that Israeli participation in IMEC would represent a de facto Arab-Israeli economic integration milestone, further isolating Tehran ideologically and diplomatically.
GEOPOLITICS
US, UK, and Allies Jointly Reject China's South China Sea Claims as Illegal
A coalition of Western and Asian nations issued a coordinated joint statement reaffirming the 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration ruling that invalidates China's sweeping territorial claims in the South China Sea. The statement signals growing multilateral resolve to counter Chinese maritime assertiveness through legal and diplomatic pressure rather than unilateral action. Watch for Beijing's response, whether ASEAN nations align or hedge, and whether this statement translates into coordinated freedom-of-navigation operations.
China's continued island-building, coast guard aggression near Philippine vessels, and harassment of fishing fleets have pushed fence-sitting nations toward collective action. The 2016 ruling — which China rejects as illegitimate — provides legal cover for a unified front. US Indo-Pacific strategy actively recruits partners to share burden of pushback, reducing the bilateral framing China prefers. Economic interdependence with China creates internal tension for signatories, making a joint diplomatic statement a relatively low-cost, high-signal move. Taiwan Strait tensions amplify stakes, as South China Sea access is strategically linked to any future conflict scenario.
pending43%
Within 1 month, China will conduct a publicly announced PLA Navy or China Coast Guard exercise or large-scale patrol operation in the South China Sea, explicitly framed by Chinese state media as a response to foreign interference or as asserting Chinese sovereignty.
POLICY
Philippine Senate Opens Impeachment Trial Against Vice President Sara Duterte
The Philippine Senate has convened as an impeachment court to try Vice President Sara Duterte, marking one of the most significant political trials in the country's recent history. The case represents a dramatic rupture between Duterte and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., former political allies whose partnership fractured over governance disputes and competing 2028 presidential ambitions. Observers should watch whether the Senate secures the two-thirds majority needed for conviction, which would bar Duterte from holding public office.
The trial is driven by the collapse of the Marcos-Duterte political alliance, which was forged for the 2022 elections but unraveled amid mutual accusations and power struggles. Sara Duterte's father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, remains a powerful political force and faces his own legal jeopardy at the ICC, creating a family dynasty under siege. Underlying structural factors include the Philippines' deeply patronage-driven politics, the outsized role of political dynasties, institutional tensions between the executive and a constitutionally independent but politically susceptible Senate, and public anxiety over democratic backsliding. The impeachment charges — which reportedly include allegations of misuse of confidential funds and threats against the President — reflect both genuine accountability concerns and unmistakable political weaponization.
pending42%
Within 1 month, Chinese state media (Global Times or Xinhua) will publish commentary or editorial on the Sara Duterte impeachment trial that characterizes it as evidence of Philippine political instability or dysfunction, implicitly contrasting it with the Marcos administration's confrontational South China Sea posture.
ENVIRONMENT
Myanmar Rare Earth Mining Poisons Mekong River, Arsenic Detected Downstream in Thailand
A new report confirms that rare earth mining operations in Myanmar are releasing arsenic into the Mekong River, with contamination now detected in mainstream sediment and exceeding safety thresholds in Thailand. This matters because the Mekong is a lifeline for tens of millions of people across six nations who depend on it for drinking water, agriculture, and food security. Watch for downstream government responses, pressure on rare earth supply chains, and whether international bodies can compel accountability from Myanmar's military-controlled mining sector.
Global demand for rare earth elements — critical to electric vehicles, wind turbines, and consumer electronics — has turbocharged extraction in loosely regulated frontier zones like Myanmar's Kachin and Shan states. Myanmar's military junta, which seized power in 2021, has actively incentivized mining by Chinese-linked operators as a revenue stream, with minimal environmental oversight or enforcement capacity. The structural tension here is acute: the green energy transition depends on rare earths, yet their extraction is producing toxic externalities that undermine ecological and human health across national borders. Mekong governance is already fragmented — the Mekong River Commission lacks binding enforcement authority — and China, the dominant upstream power and largest consumer of Myanmar's rare earths, has little incentive to impose stricter standards. Arsenic contamination of sediment is particularly insidious because it bioaccumulates in fish, rice paddies, and groundwater, creating long-latency health crises that are difficult to attribute and harder to litigate.
GEOPOLITICS
Colombia's New President De la Espriella Signals Pro-Washington Shift on Immigration and Security
Colombia's newly inaugurated president, Abelardo de la Espriella, is positioning his administration in close alignment with Washington, signaling a sharp departure from the leftist governance of predecessor Gustavo Petro. This realignment could reshape U.S.-Colombia cooperation on migration enforcement, counternarcotics, and regional security architecture. Watch for concrete policy announcements on deportation cooperation, Venezuela policy, and potential shifts in coca eradication strategy.
Several structural forces are at play: U.S. leverage through aid, trade preferences, and military cooperation creates strong incentives for Colombian governments to align with Washington; de la Espriella likely ran on a law-and-order platform capitalizing on public fatigue with insecurity and economic instability under Petro; Washington under a hardline administration is actively courting Latin American governments willing to enforce stricter migration controls and serve as regional buffers; Colombia's geographic position as a primary migration corridor from South America to North America makes it a critical pressure point for U.S. immigration enforcement strategy; and domestic conservative business and security establishment interests in Colombia benefit from restored U.S. ties.
ENVIRONMENT
China Issues Highest-Level Flood and Geological Disaster Alerts Across Multiple Regions
China's Ministry of Water Resources and China Meteorological Administration jointly issued red alerts — the highest warning level — forecasting severe flash flood and geological disaster risks across multiple regions over a 24-hour window. The coordinated dual-agency alert signals unusual severity and broad geographic scope, putting emergency response systems on maximum readiness. Watch for casualty reports, infrastructure damage, and whether the alert escalates into a declared national disaster response.
China's flood vulnerability is structural: rapid urbanization has paved over natural drainage systems, deforestation on slopes increases landslide risk, and river basin infrastructure like the Three Gorges Dam creates complex water management pressures. Climate change is intensifying precipitation intensity and unpredictability across East Asia. The joint issuance by two ministries — rather than one — reflects institutional recognition that flash floods and geological disasters are deeply coupled risks requiring coordinated response. Summer monsoon patterns routinely test China's disaster management capacity, and years of infrastructure investment have not eliminated the underlying geographic and hydrological vulnerabilities.
PENDING43%geopoliticsWithin 1 month, the Indian Navy will publicly announce activation or expansion of a naval escort/deployment operation in the Arabian…
Story: US Strikes Iran for Third Time; Iran Closes Strait of Hormuz and Attacks Gulf Allies
Within 1 month, the Indian Navy will publicly announce activation or expansion of a naval escort/deployment operation in the Arabian Sea or Gulf of Oman to protect Indian-flagged or India-bound commercial shipping in response to the Strait of Hormuz closure.
Reasoning: India imports approximately 60% of its crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz. When far less severe tanker attacks occurred in June 2019, India activated Operation Sankalp within days, deploying warships to escort Indian-flagged vessels. An actual Hormuz closure — unprecedented in severity — virtually guarantees activation of India's established naval protection reflex. The Indian Navy maintains standing deployments in the region and has institutional muscle memory for this exact scenario. This is not a novel behavior but an escalation of a documented pattern.
The prediction overestimates the applicability of India's 2019 'Operation Sankalp' response to the current 'regional war scenario' involving an *actual closure* of the Strait of Hormuz. In 2019, the threat was isolated tanker attacks, prompting a defensive escort. The current situation is fundamentally different: Iran has *closed* the strait and launched retaliatory strikes against Gulf states. This implies a direct, high-stakes confrontation with Iranian forces for any vessel attempting passage. India's strategic calculus would shift from protecting commercial interests in a low-intensity threat environment to potentially engaging in a direct military challenge to Iran's sovereignty over the strait closure, risking direct entanglement in a wider regional war. India, valuing its strategic autonomy and non-alignment, would likely prioritize de-escalation, diplomatic solutions, or securing alternative energy supplies over committing its navy to a high-risk, potentially escalatory operation that could draw it into a conflict with a major regional power. The economic self-harm Iran is willing to absorb by closing Hormuz signals an extreme resolve that India would be wary of directly challenging militarily.
Alternative outcome: Instead of a direct naval escort operation challenging the closure, India will primarily pursue a multi-pronged diplomatic strategy, engaging both Iran and other major powers (e.g., China, Russia, US) to de-escalate the conflict and reopen the Strait. Concurrently, India would activate its strategic petroleum reserves, explore alternative crude oil and LNG supply routes (e.g., from West Africa, Latin America, or via overland routes if feasible), and advise Indian-flagged vessels to reroute or avoid the region entirely until the situation stabilizes. Any naval deployment would likely be limited to humanitarian assistance, evacuation of Indian citizens, or securing sea lines of communication *outside* the immediate conflict zone, rather than directly challenging the Hormuz closure.
PENDING43%geopoliticsWithin 1 month, China will conduct a publicly announced PLA Navy or China Coast Guard exercise or large-scale patrol operation…
Story: US, UK, and Allies Jointly Reject China's South China Sea Claims as Illegal
Within 1 month, China will conduct a publicly announced PLA Navy or China Coast Guard exercise or large-scale patrol operation in the South China Sea, explicitly framed by Chinese state media as a response to foreign interference or as asserting Chinese sovereignty.
Reasoning: China's established institutional reflex to multilateral diplomatic provocations on the SCS is to conduct military exercises or coast guard operations. This pattern held after the 2016 PCA ruling, after AUKUS announcements, and after previous joint FONOPs. The current moment is especially conducive because US naval assets are heavily committed to the Middle East conflict with Iran, giving China both motivation (to test the coalition's resolve) and opportunity (reduced US presence). Chinese state media consistently frames such exercises as responses to 'external interference,' making the rhetorical framing highly predictable.
The prediction overestimates China's immediate need or strategic benefit from conducting a *publicly announced large-scale military exercise* in response to a *diplomatic statement*. While China consistently rejects the PCA ruling and asserts sovereignty, its response strategy is not monolithic. A joint diplomatic statement, while significant, is primarily a legal and political challenge, not a direct military provocation (like a freedom-of-navigation operation). A large-scale exercise, especially one explicitly framed as a direct response, risks being perceived as an overreaction that could further solidify the emerging multilateral coalition against China and alienate fence-sitting ASEAN nations, which China actively tries to court. Given the economic interdependence and the desire to avoid pushing regional partners further into the US orbit, China may opt for a less escalatory, more nuanced response to avoid inadvertently strengthening the very resolve the allies are trying to demonstrate. The 'institutional reflex' may apply to direct operational challenges, but a diplomatic statement might warrant a different, less confrontational, initial response.
Alternative outcome: Instead of a large-scale military exercise, China is more likely to engage in a multi-pronged, primarily diplomatic and informational counter-offensive. This would involve issuing strong condemnations through state media and foreign ministry spokespersons, reiterating its historical claims, potentially summoning ambassadors, and increasing bilateral diplomatic pressure on individual signatories, particularly those in ASEAN, to dilute the coalition's unity. Concurrently, China might quietly increase routine coast guard patrols or maritime militia presence in disputed areas without a public announcement or explicit framing as a direct response to the statement, thus asserting presence without the escalatory signal of a major exercise. This approach allows China to save face and assert claims without risking further international condemnation or solidifying the anti-China coalition.
PENDING42%policyWithin 1 month, Chinese state media (Global Times or Xinhua) will publish commentary or editorial on the Sara Duterte impeachment…
Story: Philippine Senate Opens Impeachment Trial Against Vice President Sara Duterte
Within 1 month, Chinese state media (Global Times or Xinhua) will publish commentary or editorial on the Sara Duterte impeachment trial that characterizes it as evidence of Philippine political instability or dysfunction, implicitly contrasting it with the Marcos administration's confrontational South China Sea posture.
Reasoning: China's state media apparatus has a documented, near-reflexive pattern of commenting on major Philippine political developments, particularly when they intersect with SCS dynamics. The Duterte family historically pursued a more accommodating China policy, while Marcos has aligned closely with the US on SCS. The simultaneous occurrence of the impeachment trial and the allied joint rejection of China's SCS claims (today's front page) creates a strong incentive for Chinese state media to frame the trial as political instability caused by the Marcos camp's priorities. Global Times editorials on Philippine affairs are frequent and reliably appear within days of major events.
The strongest case against this prediction is that China's state media may strategically choose *not* to publish commentary or editorials on the Sara Duterte impeachment trial, or at least not in the specific manner predicted. Directly editorializing on an ongoing, highly sensitive internal political process like an impeachment trial, especially one involving a prominent political family that historically pursued a more accommodating China policy, carries significant risks of backfire. Such commentary could be perceived as undue interference in Philippine internal affairs, potentially generating a nationalist backlash that unites factions against perceived Chinese meddling, rather than highlighting division. China might calculate that silence or minimal, factual reporting on the trial is a more prudent approach, allowing internal divisions to play out without providing external fuel. Publicly gloating or criticizing the trial could alienate potential future allies within the Philippines or even push the Duterte faction closer to Marcos in a nationalistic response. China often prioritizes long-term strategic goals over short-term propaganda wins, and wading into the intricacies of an impeachment trial with explicit political commentary might be seen as counterproductive to its broader objectives in the region.
Alternative outcome: Instead of editorializing on the impeachment trial, Chinese state media will continue its strong rhetoric against President Marcos Jr.'s South China Sea posture, but will largely *ignore* or provide only factual, non-editorialized reporting on the Sara Duterte impeachment trial. Their focus will remain on directly criticizing Marcos's alignment with the US on SCS, framing it as 'US meddling' or 'Philippine provocations,' without attempting to link it to the internal political instability suggested by the impeachment. If any commentary on Philippine internal affairs occurs, it would likely be much more general, focusing on 'internal challenges' or 'US-induced instability' without specific reference to the impeachment, or it would be significantly delayed until after the immediate political heat of the trial has subsided.
‘;
content.innerHTML = html;
overlay.style.display = ‘flex’;
}
function cronkiteShowEditorial(btn) {
var data = JSON.parse(btn.getAttribute(‘data-predictions’));
var overlay = document.getElementById(‘cn-editorial-overlay’);
var content = document.getElementById(‘cn-editorial-content’);
var html = ”;
for (var i = 0; i = cnHit ? ‘#166534’ : (p.score >= cnMiss ? ‘#92400E’ : ‘#991B1B’)) : ‘#78716C’;
html += ‘
‘;
html += ‘
‘;
if (hasScore) {
html += ‘‘ + p.score + ‘/100‘;
} else {
html += ‘AWAITING OUTCOME‘;
}
html += ‘‘ + p.confidence + ‘% confidence‘;
if (p.timeframe) html += ‘‘ + escH(p.timeframe) + ‘‘;
html += ‘
‘;
html += ‘
‘ + escH(p.prediction) + ‘
‘;
html += ‘Causal reasoning
‘ + escH(p.reasoning) + ‘
‘;
if (hasScore && p.outcome) {
html += ‘
What happened: ‘ + escH(p.outcome);
if (p.outcome_reasoning) html += ‘ ‘ + escH(p.outcome_reasoning) + ‘‘;
html += ‘
‘;
}
if (!hasScore && p.check_date) {
html += ‘
Check date: ‘ + escH(p.check_date) + ‘
‘;
}
html += ‘
‘;
}
if (!html) html = ‘
No predictions for this story.
‘;
content.innerHTML = html;
overlay.style.display = ‘flex’;
}
function escH(s) {
var d = document.createElement(‘div’);
d.textContent = s || ”;
return d.innerHTML;
}